From research to people

The same team does the science and puts it to work.

Research becomes a new model version. Partner labs have it within days. Through them it reaches healthcare providers, and through them, the people they care for.

Every version is validated and numbered, never silently updated, so a person's whole history stays on one scale.

The science

More signal from less data.

Health data is sparse and expensive. Our models are built to get more from a handful of common blood markers, and judged on real health outcomes. No new test, no new sample, no new workflow.

Peer reviewed

Tested against what actually happened to 306,000 people.

Built with Imperial College London and published in Communications Biology, a Nature Portfolio journal, on UK Biobank data with more than a decade of follow up.

306K PARTICIPANTS

0.778 CONCORDANCE

↑11% VS PHENOAGE

10+ yrs OF OUTCOMES

Concordance measures how well a score ranks people by what later happened to their health. 0.5 is a coin toss. 1.0 is perfect.

Concordance per panelPredictive concordance by blood panel. PhenoAge scores 0.731. Humanity Age scores 0.733 from a complete blood count, rising to 0.743 on expanded and comprehensive panels. BMI scores 0.712 and CMP 0.718, both below PhenoAge.PANELCONCORDANCEExpanded + Comprehensive0.743Routine Health Panel0.738CBC + Cholesterol0.735Complete Blood Count0.733PhenoAge0.731CMP0.718BMI0.712PREVIOUS GOLD STANDARD Concordance per panelPredictive concordance by blood panel. PhenoAge scores 0.731. Humanity Age scores 0.733 from a complete blood count, rising to 0.743 on expanded and comprehensive panels. BMI scores 0.712 and CMP 0.718, both below PhenoAge.CONCORDANCEExpanded + Comprehensive0.743Routine Health Panel0.738CBC + Cholesterol0.735Complete Blood Count0.733PhenoAge 0.731CMP0.718BMI0.712PHENOAGE: PREVIOUS GOLD STANDARD
Headline figures are from the published paper, where Humanity Age scores 0.778 against PhenoAge’s 0.750, an 11% relative gain in predictive value. The chart shows the current model working from each panel type, with unmeasured markers estimated, and PhenoAge on the same data. Routine panels carry 20 to 30 markers, expanded and comprehensive panels 40 or more.

Read the paper →

Imputation

A handful of markers is enough.

Most blood tests measure a fraction of what the model can read. It estimates the rest from the connections between the markers that were measured.

Compatible with 58 common analytes. A routine panel, such as a complete blood count, is one example.

Drivers of aging

One number, eight systems.

Every result breaks down into the eight biological systems behind it, so a lab can show what is adding years and what is taking them away.

EXAMPLE RESULT

Every partner lab switched the drivers on as soon as they shipped.

In development

What we are building

A large biological model, built with UCL.

With UCL, we are training a model to learn how biology actually works: cause and effect, not just correlation. Because it learns causes, it needs less data each time it is applied.

AI agents run the research loop. Each one proposes an idea, trains on it, tests it on data it has never seen and keeps what it learned, so the next idea starts sharper.

An illustration of our live research view. Details withheld.

Sharper estimates

Better estimates of the markers a panel did not measure.

A sharper biological age

More accurate results from the same blood test.

New predictions

For partners working on everything from cancer and heart risk to women's health.

Every gain is validated before it reaches a partner lab.

Data and privacy

De-identified by design.

Partner systems keep the patient. Only de-identified panel values reach us, so no patient identifying data is shared with Humanity.

SOC 2 Type 2 ISO 27001 GDPR COMPLIANT

Prediction is all you need.

Biological age is the proof, not the product. Read Michael Geer on where prediction goes next.